BODYCAST
- THE OFFICIAL JOURNAL OF THE CSOT
Distal radius fractures -
Closed reduction and casting
By Kostas P. Panagiotopoulos,
MD, FRese, Vancouver, Be
Originally printed in the COA Bulletin #71, November/December 2005. Reprinted with kind permission.
-
Distal radius fractures are among the most common injuries
seen by the orthopaedic surgeon. In order to manage these
injuries with closed reduction and casting, the fractures must
be reducible with closed manipulation and they must remain
stable until healing occurs.
The indications and success of closed manipulation and casting
are dependent on many factors. These include patient age,
bone quality, occupation, associated injuries, degree of initial
displacement, cancellous impaction and cortical comminution.
In general, nonoperative treatment is recommended for
undisplaced extra- and intra-articular fractures for stable,
displaced fractures, and certain unstable fractures in elderly,
lower-demand individuals where some secondary displacement
is acceptable (Fernandez, 2005).
There is a strong correlation between the initial radiographs and
success of closed manipulation and casting. Fractures
are considered unstable if the initial radiographs show 200 or
more dorsal (or volar) angulation, displacement of more than
two-thirds width of the shaft, metaphyseal comminution, more
than five rnillimetres of shortening, intra-articular extension,
associated ulnar fracture or advanced osteoporosis. If three or
more risk factors are present, there is a higher likelihood of fracture
collapse (Lafontaine, Delince, Hardy, & Simons, 1989). In these
cases, the treating physician may consider surgical intervention
on immediate presentation. Other studies have shown that
radial shortening is a very reliable indicator of future shortening
(Altissirni, Mancini, Azzara, & Ciaffoloni, 1994; Hove, Solheim,
Skjeie, & Sorensen, 1994). In addition, older patients seem to be
at higher risk for future displacement given the poor bone quality (Leone, Bhandari, Adili, McKenzie, Moro & Dunlop,
2004; Nesbitt, Failla, & Les, 2004).
In most instances, the decision to proceed to operative
intervention is made after looking at the initial radiographs.
Despite the plan for operative treatment, it is still prudent to
attempt a closed reduction in order to improve patient comfort,
restore anatomy for surgical planning and relieve pressure on
any neurologic structures.
In order to carry out closed manipulation, adequate analgesia
is required. Hematoma blocks, intravenou regional sedation,
brachial plexus block and general anesthesia are all reliable
methods. In most cases, a hematoma block or intravenous
regional sedation is adequate. Some authors recommend
injection solution through the volar cortex in addition to
infiltrating the distal radioulnar joint and ulnar styloid fracture
in order to provide complete analgesia. Regional blocks are
indicated in cases where a difficult reduction is anticipated.
General anesthesia is indicated for special circumstances such
as paediatric fractures (Fernandez, 2005).
|
|